Benin and the Europeans 1485-1897

Date
1969
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
London: Longman Group Limited
Abstract

The Benin Kingdom—an historical perspective The era of Portuguese monopoly:

  1. First contacts
  2. The beginning of trade
  3. The island trade and the first mission
  4. The resumption of royal trade
  5. The end of Portuguese monopoly: the second mission English and Dutch beginnings:
  6. The English
  7. The Dutch The Capuchin missions:
  8. Spanish missionaries
  9. Italian missionaries The Dutch at Ughoton:
  10. Trade in the main river (1650-1700)
  11. Establishment at Ughoton
  12. Trade and conflict
  13. Efforts to diversify trade
  14. European rivals and Dutch decline
  15. We’re here because we’re here The slave-trade era:
  16. English and French in the mid-eighteenth century
  17. Landolphe’s enterprise in the main river
  18. The last years of the slave trade British encroachment:
  19. Trade and the flag in the Benin River
  20. The first consular visit to Benin
  21. Retreat into the heartlands
  22. The growth of commercial and consular pressures
  23. The Protection Treaty of 1892
  24. The dispute over trade
  25. Consul-General Moor’s campaign against Benin
  26. The massacre and punitive expedition
Description
This book is the outcome of research undertaken while I was associated with the Scheme for the Study of Benin History and culture, begun in 1956 under the directorship of Dr. K. O. Dike, the Benin Scheme was one of the earliest interdisciplinary projects devoted to the study of the history of Africa south of the Sahara. By bringing together anthropologists, historians, ethnographers, archaeologists, and concentrating their attention upon an African state renowned for the depth of its historical tradition and the richness of its cultural heritage, the scheme purposed to demonstrate that the past of an African people may be reconstructed in exactly the same manner as that of any other people for which similar evidence is available, and that the lack of certain conventional materials of historical research did not preclude research that measured up to the standards of modern historiography.
Keywords
Citation